contract between developer and city for wastewater treatment plant to be built by developer and conveyed to city.

MTAS was asked who appoints a judge to serve while the city judge is temporarily absent and whether the quailfications for the temporary city judge and the permanent judge are the same.

MTAS was asked to analyze the question of whether the director of the regional planning commission was appointed by the planning commission or by the city's governing body.

A legal opinion was requested from MTAS on whether Tennessee Code Annotated § 6-58-118 may be used as the legal basis for bringing a piece of property into Gallatin’s urban growth boundary that will ultimately be annexed into the City.

MTAS was asked about the legality of annexing parcels that are not contiguous to either the former municipal limits nor to any of the tracts that were annexed that do adjoin city limits or tracts contiguous to them.

MTAS was asked for an application form for wastewater service.

MTAS was asked whether it is lawful for the city to base the award of competitive bids on the preference for local contractors or providers of goods and services.

MTAS was asked whether a city may adopt an ordinance repealing its previous annexation ordinance.

MTAS was asked what the word 'citizen' in the City Charter means with respect to the eligibility of a person to be selected by the board of mayor and aldermen to fill a vacancy on that board.

The Mt. Pleasant Water department created a plan to establish policies, rules and plans to be used during a drought or water shortage.