Legal Documents of Mountain City

Code of Mountain City

Table of Contents » Title 5 Municipal Finance and Taxation » Chapter 5 Purchasing » § 5-511 Sealed competitive proposals.
Mountain City
Title 5 : Municipal Finance and Taxation
Chapter 5 : Purchasing

5-511 : Sealed competitive proposals.

Tennessee Code Annotated, § 12-3-1207, authorizes municipalities to use, under certain circumstances, competitive sealed proposals to purchase goods and services rather than competitive sealed bids and requires that a municipality adopt by ordinance a procurement code before purchases may be made as authorized. As provided in Tennessee Code Annotated, § 12-3-1207, competitive sealed proposals may be used only when qualifications, experience, or competence are more important than price in making the purchase and:

  1. When there is more than one (1) solution to a purchasing issue and the competitive sealed proposals will assist in choosing the best solution; or
  2. When there is no readily identifiable solution to a purchasing issue and the competitive sealed proposals will assist in identifying one (1) or more solutions.

    Municipalities may make purchases using competitive sealed proposals rather than competitive sealed bids when the governing body determines that competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the municipality. Adequate public notice must be given for the request for proposals in the same manner as for requests for competitive sealed bids. The request for proposals must state the relative importance of price and other factors. Proposals must be opened in a manner that avoids disclosure of contents to competing respondents during the later negotiations. Proposals must be open to public inspection when the intent to award the contract to a particular respondent is announced. Discussions for clarification may be conducted with responsible respondents who submit proposals that have been determined by the purchasing agent to be viable for selection. These respondents must be given fair treatment relative to discussion and revision of proposals. Revisions to submitted proposals are permitted before the intent to award to a particular respondent is announced. In the discussions, the purchasing agent and other municipal personnel may not disclose information derived from competing proposals. The award must be made to the responsible respondent whose proposal the governing body determines is most advantageous to the municipality. The purchasing agent must place in the file a statement containing the basis on which the award was made. (Ord. #1821, June 2023)