What can we help you find today?

City of Manchester Board Evaluation

Print This PagePrint This Page Send by EmailSend by Email
Reviewed Date: May 31, 2017

Original Author: 
Darden, Don
Date Created: 
Aug 14, 2001


Subjects:
Boards--Municipal
City administrator
Personnel--Performance appraisal

City of Manchester Board Evaluation

Summary: 
This evaluation form is designed to help the Board understand the expectations of the city administrator in his relationship to the Board.

Knowledgebase-City of Manchester Board Evaluation

CITY OF MANCHESTER

BOARD EVALUATION


[Every city with professional administration has an informal evaluation process in which the Board is evaluating the administrator, and the administrator is evaluating the Board. It is understood that the Board of Mayor and Aldermen is evaluated by the voting public on election day. It is also understood that the city administrator is subordinate to and serves at the pleasure of the Board of Mayor and Aldermen. Having stated this premise, many cities have determined, nevertheless, that a formal written evaluation process is in the best interest of the city by helping to reduce or eliminate misunderstandings and communications problems and creating a work environment characterized by fairness both to the Board and to the city administrator. The following evaluation is simply designed to help the Board understand the expectations of the city administrator in his relationship to the Board. A Ayes@or Ano@is requested for each of the five communications criteria.]

The city administrator is requested to complete the evaluation for the Board of Mayor and Aldermen as a whole and provide copies to the Mayor and each Board member.

____________1. The Board provides the opportunity for the city administrator to carry out his/her duties and responsibilities in accordance with Board policies without interference.

____________2. Board members micro-manage the city.

____________3. Board provides general direction and policies to assist the city administrator in carrying out his/her duties and responsibilities.

____________4. Board demonstrates more concern for administrative matters than for policy considerations.

____________5. Board interferes with directives from the city administrator to subordinate staff members and communicates with department heads about matters that it is unwilling to communicate with the city administrator about.

THE FINAL STEP IN THIS EVALUATION PROCESS IS A MEETING OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND BOARD OF MAYOR AND ALDERMEN TO DISCUSS ANY UNRESOLVED CONCERNS RESULTING FROM THE EVALUATIONS.


Attachment(s):

About Our Knowledgebase

MTAS letters and publications were written based upon the law at the time and/or a specific sets of facts. The laws referenced in the letters and publications may have changed and/or the technical advice provided may not be applicable to your city or circumstances. Always consult with your city attorney or an MTAS consultant before taking any action based on information contained in this database.