As an employer you can violate federal law by using the Form I-9 in a discriminatory manner. Employer sanctions and anti-discrimination provision of the INA were added by the Immigration Reform and Control Act and prohibits four types of unlawful conduct:
- Citizenship or immigration status discrimination;
- National origin discrimination;
- Unfair documentary practices during Form I-9 process (document abuse); and
Discriminatory documentary practices related to verifying the employment authorization and the identity of employees during Form I-9 process is called "document abuse" according to the handbook. Document abuse occurs when employers treat individuals differently on the basis of national origin or citizenship status in the Form I-9 process. Document abuse can be categorized into four types of conduct:
- Improperly requesting that employees produce more documents than are required;
- Improperly requesting that employees present a particular document;
- Improperly rejecting documents that reasonably appear to be genuine and belong to the employee presenting them; and
- Improperly treating groups of applicants differently when completing Form I-9, such as requiring certain groups of employees who look or sound foreign to produce particular documents the employer does not require other employees to produce.
Immigration status or citizenship discrimination occurs when employees are treated differently based on their citizenship or immigration status in regard to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee. Employer must treat all groups the same.
When an employer treats employees differently in the employment process based on their national origin, that behavior constitutes national origin discrimination. An employee’s national origin relates to the employee’s place of birth, country of origin, ancestry, native language and accent.
The handbook specifically states that “retaliation occurs when an employer or other covered entity intimidates, threatens, coerces, or otherwise retaliates against an individual because the individual has filed an immigration–related employment discrimination charge or complaint; has testified or participated in any immigration–related employment discrimination investigation, proceedings, or hearing; or otherwise asserts his/her rights under the INA’s anti-discrimination provisions.”
The Office of Special Council for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice (OSC), enforces the anti-discrimination provisions of the INA. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, also prohibits national origin discrimination, among other types of conduct. OSC and EEOC share jurisdiction over national origin discrimination charges. Generally, the EEOC has jurisdiction over larger employers with 15 or more employees, whereas OSC has jurisdiction over smaller employers with between four and 14 employees.
The DHS may also impose penalties if it is revealed that an employer knowingly hired or knowingly continued to employ an unauthorized worker, or failed to comply with the employment eligibility verification requirements with respect to employees hired after November 6, 1986. “If DHS determines that you knowingly hired unauthorized aliens, continued to employ aliens knowing that they were not authorized or have become unauthorized to work in the United States, or practiced unlawful discrimination, you may be ordered to cease and desist from such activities and pay a civil penalty of $375 and not more than $3,200 for a first offense; not less than $3,2000 and not more than $6,5000 for a second offense; and up to $16,000 for each subsequent offense of an unauthorized alien. The penalty can also include possible imprisonment. Failure to properly complete, retain, and/or make available for inspection Forms I-9 could result in a civil penalty in an amount not less than $110 and not more than $1,100 for each violation.”