Knowledgebase-Denying a Business License to a Person Whose Business Establishment is in Violation of the City's Zoning Ordinance


Information Product

Title:Denying a Business License to a Person Whose Business Establishment is in Violation of the City's Zoning Ordinance
Summary:MTAS was asked whether the city can deny a business license to a person whose
business establishment is in violation of the city's zoning ordinance.
Original Author:Hemsley, Sid
Co-Author:
Product Create Date:02/08/96
Last Reviewed on::05/05/2017
Subject:Businesses; Businesses--Licenses and permits; Licenses and permits; Zoning--Laws and regulations
Type:Legal Opinion
Legal Opinion:

Reference Documents:

Text of Document: February 8, 1996

Can the city deny a business license to a person whose business establishment is in violation of the city's zoning ordinance?

The answer is clearly no.

That precise question arose in State ex rel. Polin v. Hill, 547 S.W.2d 916 (1977). There the City of Gatlinburg refused to issue business licenses to four businessmen whose businesses the city claimed were in violation of the zoning ordinance and another ordinance that prohibited activities that interfered with the normal use of adjacent sidewalks [Ordinance 330]. Section 5 of the latter ordinance provided that:

[A]ny officer or employee of the City of Gatlinburg charged with the responsibility of issuing privilege licenses is hereby authorized to refuse to issue a Privilege [sic] license to any applicant when it is apparent that the contemplated activities under the privilege license for which application is made involve activities made unlawful by this ordinance.

The Tennessee Supreme Court held illegal the city's denial of the businesses licenses, saying:

Section V [sic] of Ordinance 330 cannot be used to deny relators the right to procure a license required by the Business Tax Act, a state law of general application. Nor can the zoning ordinance be enforced by the indirect method employed here. [At 918]

The Court reasoned that under the Business Tax Act the city had only the power with respect to the issuance of business licenses contained in that Act, that under that Act "the only condition precedent to the issuance of the license is payment of the tax and no grounds are provided upon which to predicate a refusal to issue said license," and that:

Enforcement of these ordinances must be by direct proceedings as prescribed by law wherein the possession or non-possession of the privilege license required by T.C.A. 67-5819 is as irrelevant as compliance or non-compliance with said ordinances are to this proceeding. [AT 917, 918]

Under Polin, if an applicant tenders the money for a business license, the Business Tax Act requires that the license be issued, and the city cannot use any other grounds to deny the applicant the license.

Sincerely,

Sidney D. Hemsley
Senior Law Consultant

SDH/

Please remember that these legal opinions were written based on the facts of a given city at a certain time. The laws referenced in any opinion may have changed or may not be applicable to your city or circumstances.

Always consult with your city attorney or an MTAS consultant before taking any action based on information contained in this database.